| Chiefs Corner
for March, 2000 In America today there are very few organizations you can call and they will have
a representative at your door in 7 minutes or less. That representative is
ready to handle about any situation the caller perceived they could not handle by
themselves. In many cases the seriousness of the problem is increasing at an
expediential rate (The car is on fire in the garage and it is spreading to the
house). These usually involve heavy property loss or potential life threats.
Sometimes however the
problems are not serious but annoying like smoke from a pile of leaves in a yard or from a
commercial property in the vicinity of the calling party. It is easy to get the fire
department on the phone and they always respond. Upon arrival the caller explains
the problem and the fire department makes a good faith effort to resolve the
issue. However, there are times when the fire department can not resolve an
issue.
A recent case involved a
resident who complained about smoke form a near by landfill. The fire department had
extinguished a fire at the landfill but knew it would probably re-start given the nature
of the burning material and the size of the pile. The fire department contacted the
various agencies responsible for landfills and the office of County Fire Marshal.
Both agreed to a plan that would contain the fire and prevent it from spreading. In
addition the landfill operator was advised to extinguish the fire using his
equipment.
The smoke continued for
days while the various county agencies tried to get the operator to put out the
fire. During this time the original caller continued to call the fire department and
complain about the smoke. The calling party was advised of the problem and what was
being done to correct it. The homeowner was not satisfied and wrote to the local
newspapers and the homeowners association blaming the fire department for not acting to
put out the fire which was causing the smoke. . It was not until after several
meetings that the resident understood what role the fire department played in the initial
control of the problem and who would be responsible for finial resolution of the
problem. Because the fire department is easy to contact and highly visible the
homeowner took their frustrations out on the group who was most responsive to their needs
in the first place.
In another example a
dispute broke out between two business parties at a local airport. Fire
department access to the business became a secondary issue covering up a commercial
dispute over the price of fuel. Each party tried to involve the fire department to
support their side of the issue. This dispute became so heated that the local VFD,
to put their neutral position directly to both parties, retained legal council. This
cost the taxpayers of the fire district several thousand dollars, money that could have
been spent on fire education or suppression equipment.
What should residents
expect from the Fire Department? Property loss control and life safety risk
mitigation is the top priority for all fire departments and these are certainly shared
expectations by most citizens. However, after these two critical tasks, the
expectation divergence gets wider. How does a fire department balance public option
against the variety of requests made everyday to handle situations not part of the
departments mission statement? The fire department is in the business of
protecting risks. Were in the business of responding to events that those
risks create. This means that the public and the fire departments need
to understand each others position when it comes to measuring performance and accepting
personal responsibility for those things that go on around us every day.
|